This reminds me of the 9 year old girl in South America who was raped by her stepfather and got pregnant. The mom, the abortion doctors, and the girl were all excommunicated, but the rapist stepfather was not.
In regards to that case, there was a thread on Christian Forums where it was mentioned.
Here are some
responses:
Even if the 9 year old was raped and beaten it doesn't justify forcing her to kill her baby. Two wrongs don't make a right.
Tom, what if this were your 9 year old daughter? Would you force her to carry twins to term?
Yes, we don't kill innocent human beings for convenience.
I'm glad the mental and physical health of his 9-year-old daughter is just a matter of 'convenience' to him. "Sorry having your life ruined is inconvenient for you."
Edit: Here's a question someone asked:
Is it okay to let a child be subjected to an awful life or ruin yours or kill you for your personal need for over population?
Here are some of the responses.
Is it ok to deny a human being the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
If the life of an innocent baby means that little, of what value are any of your reasons for advocating abortion by comparison?
Notice how they pussyfoot around the question by asking another questions. They never actually address the question itself. These people are
disgusting and the absolute worst scum of the earth. They have to protect the innocent babies, at least until the baby is born a girl and is forcibly impregnated while she's still a child, then to fuck with
her health and rights. Sorry, hon, your parents are more concerned about the new "baby" than they are about you. You're second fiddle. They'll sacrifice the life and health of
children just so they can fell morally good about themselves. The fetus is sacred until it, too, holds a fetus. And if one of the theories for fetus in fetu is correct, that actually happens.