Author Topic: Trump’s presidency was prophezized by a book in the 1800s and the Bible!  (Read 16129 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jacob Harrison

  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 1571
  • Gender: Male
  • The person who discovered England's true monarch
https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-predicted-ingersoll-lockwood-adventures-barron-melania-last-644284

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0uedwAxbSE&app=desktop

Hopefully this prophecy come true will convert you guys to Christianity in these end days before the second coming of Christ.

Perhaps Trumps presidency is somehow connected with my plans to have the true English monarch come to the throne liberate Constantinople and the Holy Land which would involve war with the Antichrist Muslim countries who would try to gain back Palestine. Hallelujah!
« Last Edit: August 10, 2018, 08:39:14 pm by Jacob Harrison »

Offline dpareja

  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 5680
What.

The.

Ever.

Loving.

Fuck.
Quote from: Jordan Duram
It doesn't concern you, Sister, that kind of absolutist view of the universe? Right and wrong determined solely by a single all-knowing, all powerful being whose judgment cannot be questioned and in whose name the most horrendous acts can be sanctioned without appeal?

Quote from: Supreme Court of Canada
Being required by someone else’s religious beliefs to behave contrary to one’s sexual identity is degrading and disrespectful.

Offline Jacob Harrison

  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 1571
  • Gender: Male
  • The person who discovered England's true monarch
What.

The.

Ever.

Loving.

Fuck.

I know it is shocking. How accurate those 1800s novels were and The Bible prophecy.

Offline Tolpuddle Martyr

  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 3716
  • Have you got thumbs? SHOW ME YOUR FUCKING THUMBS!
Quote
Lavish old fashioned clothing

Have you seen Trump's dress sense? He looks like he slept in his suit.

Offline Jacob Harrison

  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 1571
  • Gender: Male
  • The person who discovered England's true monarch
Quote
Lavish old fashioned clothing

Have you seen Trump's dress sense? He looks like he slept in his suit.

It was written so that people back then would understand. But how do you explain other accurate things such as the fact that the protagonist  is named Baron Trump, and the hotel on 5th Avenue where Trump tower is now?

Offline ironbite

  • Overlord of all that is good in Iacon City
  • Kakarot
  • ******
  • Posts: 10686
  • Gender: Male
  • Stuck in the middle with you.
Go back to fucking your second cousin in her jeans.

Offline Tolpuddle Martyr

  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 3716
  • Have you got thumbs? SHOW ME YOUR FUCKING THUMBS!
Quote
Lavish old fashioned clothing

Have you seen Trump's dress sense? He looks like he slept in his suit.

It was written so that people back then would understand. But how do you explain other accurate things such as the fact that the protagonist  is named Baron Trump, and the hotel on 5th Avenue where Trump tower is now?

Take it away Snopes!

Quote
Finally, the book mentions”The Fifth Avenue Hotel,” meaning that it shares a street with Trump Tower. Since Fifth Avenue is, a well-known part of New York that has been the site for several high-end restaurants, shops and hotels since the late 1800s (the Waldorf–Astoria was constructed on Fifth Avenue in 1893), this detail seems to be more a reflection of the time it was written, and less a prescient note of where Trump Tower would eventually be constructed.

Although these books contain some seemingly bizarre coincidences, they are not evidence that Donald Trump has access to a time machine. Time travel conspiracy theories such as this one pick and choose material that supports their conclusions while ignoring everything else. For instance, these books also contain giant turtles, alternate dimensions, a battle with a big white crane, a dog named Bulgar, and a little smiling man frozen in time. Since these aspects have no clear connection to the Trumps, they are omitted from the conspiracy theory.

Even if you could prove extra dimensions, time travelling Republicans and produce a dog called Bulgar none of this makes this a specifically biblical premonition. It'd only prove some maniac let Donald Trump near a time machine!

Which it hasn't proven, don't get too excited. Like I said in the last post you ran away from, you aren't trying to convince you who'd believe anything that fit your mad little worldview, you're trying to convince us. Know your audience, try to convince them.

Offline Jacob Harrison

  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 1571
  • Gender: Male
  • The person who discovered England's true monarch
The fact that there was a character called Trump and the sequel was a book about the last President shows that it was a prophecy. Since time travel will probably not be invented for a long time, it is more likely that the author had a revelation from God. And did you watch the YouTube video that shows that Trump was in bible prophecy?

Offline Tolpuddle Martyr

  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 3716
  • Have you got thumbs? SHOW ME YOUR FUCKING THUMBS!
The fact that there was a character called Trump and the sequel was a book about the last President shows that it was a prophecy. Since time travel will probably not be invented for a long time, it is more likely that the author had a revelation from God. And did you watch the YouTube video that shows that Trump was in bible prophecy?

There's no evidence that God exists, it's why it's called a "faith" and not "data gleaned from the evidence."

There's no evidence that time travel is possible, there are a few hypothetical ways it may be done all of which rely on negative mass and stupendous amounts of matter and energy and then there's getting around the whole causality thing.

There is evidence that coincidences do occur, sure it's an improbable coincidence but we can rule out time travel and revelations from God as there is no evidence that either of those things are real.

Take it away Sherlock.

Quote
It is an old maxim of mine that when you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.

Improbable coincidences are improbable but, as far as we know, time travel and God aren't possible because nobody has shown them to be possible yet.

Offline Skybison

  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 1289
The Trump Presidency is proof that time travel in impossible, or at least will never be invented by humans, because if it was possible then Time Travelers would have come back in time to stop him by now.

The Trump Presidency also proves that the Christian God does not exist because he is all powerful and all loving.  But a loving God would never allow Trump to become president, and an all powerful god could easily prevent it so the fact that Trump is president means God does not exist.

Offline Jacob Harrison

  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 1571
  • Gender: Male
  • The person who discovered England's true monarch
The Trump Presidency is proof that time travel in impossible, or at least will never be invented by humans, because if it was possible then Time Travelers would have come back in time to stop him by now.

The Trump Presidency also proves that the Christian God does not exist because he is all powerful and all loving.  But a loving God would never allow Trump to become president, and an all powerful god could easily prevent it so the fact that Trump is president means God does not exist.

God supports Trump’s presidency because of Trumps pro Christian policies. Unfortunetely Trump is still going to hell because he is divorced and remarried.

And if you travel back in time, you actually causes parallel universes to be created because changing something in history will create a timeline where the time traveler does not go back in time to change history reverting to the previous timeline which creates two simultaneous realities. So there probably are parallel universes where Trump was stopped. I pity the Americans from those universes who have to suffer under crooked Hillary’s presidency.

Offline dpareja

  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 5680
You mean those pro-Christian policies that turn back (largely Catholic) people from Latin America? You mean those pro-Christian policies that want to discriminate against immigrants when the Bible explicitly commands you to treat the sojourner in your land as if he were of your own people?

The Republican Party has been, for quite some time, the party of Christian theocracy, in direct contradiction to the very first guarantee of the First Amendment to the US Constitution (freedom from religion). That can fuck back off to the intellectual shithole it crawled out of, and your theocracy-loving, democracy-hating ass can go there with it.
Quote from: Jordan Duram
It doesn't concern you, Sister, that kind of absolutist view of the universe? Right and wrong determined solely by a single all-knowing, all powerful being whose judgment cannot be questioned and in whose name the most horrendous acts can be sanctioned without appeal?

Quote from: Supreme Court of Canada
Being required by someone else’s religious beliefs to behave contrary to one’s sexual identity is degrading and disrespectful.

Offline Jacob Harrison

  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 1571
  • Gender: Male
  • The person who discovered England's true monarch
You mean those pro-Christian policies that turn back (largely Catholic) people from Latin America? You mean those pro-Christian policies that want to discriminate against immigrants when the Bible explicitly commands you to treat the sojourner in your land as if he were of your own people?

The Republican Party has been, for quite some time, the party of Christian theocracy, in direct contradiction to the very first guarantee of the First Amendment to the US Constitution (freedom from religion). That can fuck back off to the intellectual shithole it crawled out of, and your theocracy-loving, democracy-hating ass can go there with it.

Well to become part of Israel, in the Old Testament, the immigrants had to assimilate by converting. Similarly Immigrants to the US must assimilate into American culture and they must come here legally. Ancient Israel had immigration laws and so does the United States. And also there are already a bunch of legal American’s of Hispanic Catholic descent from Puerto Rico and also due to the US gaining Florida, and territories from Mexico in the Mexican American War.

The First Amendment does guarantee freedom of religion, but it does not say that the government cannot promote Christianity. It does prevents any particular sect of Christianity from being established as a state religion, but that is different from the myth of separation of Church and state. In fact at the time the First Amendment was written, the states had anti blasphemy laws on their charters.
« Last Edit: August 12, 2018, 07:26:55 pm by Jacob Harrison »

Offline dpareja

  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 5680
See Leviticus 19 and Deuteronomy 10 regarding the injunction to treat sojourners as your own.

The First Amendment first guarantees freedom from religion, and then, secondarily, freedom of religion. (It would have been easy to write it the other way around, but it isn't written that way.) It absolutely means the government cannot promote Christianity, or any sect thereof, or any other religion, or religion generally (or irreligion). Furthermore, one of the US's oldest treaties, which was ratified unanimously by the Senate (23-0, 9 not voting, so even over the required two-thirds if that had to be an absolute matter) includes in it a clause explicitly stating that the US is not a Christian nation. Many of the people who wrote that document were from Virginia, which itself was actually aggressively secular, and, yes, it was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state so that no religion could use the government to oppress other religions.

The US Supreme Court has indeed held that Jefferson's writings (in particular, his letter to the Danbury Baptists, who were being persecuted in Connecticut as they were not Congregationalists) "may be accepted as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] Amendment." (Reynolds v. U.S., 1879.) However, at the time those amendments were understood only to apply to acts of Congress, not the states, and it would not be until well after the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment (since the Privileges and Immunities Clause, which should have immediately applied all those provisions to the states, was instead ignored in the Slaughter-House Cases) that such state laws, including anti-blasphemy laws, were struck down.
Quote from: Jordan Duram
It doesn't concern you, Sister, that kind of absolutist view of the universe? Right and wrong determined solely by a single all-knowing, all powerful being whose judgment cannot be questioned and in whose name the most horrendous acts can be sanctioned without appeal?

Quote from: Supreme Court of Canada
Being required by someone else’s religious beliefs to behave contrary to one’s sexual identity is degrading and disrespectful.

Offline Jacob Harrison

  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 1571
  • Gender: Male
  • The person who discovered England's true monarch
See Leviticus 19 and Deuteronomy 10 regarding the injunction to treat sojourners as your own.

The First Amendment first guarantees freedom from religion, and then, secondarily, freedom of religion. (It would have been easy to write it the other way around, but it isn't written that way.) It absolutely means the government cannot promote Christianity, or any sect thereof, or any other religion, or religion generally (or irreligion). Furthermore, one of the US's oldest treaties, which was ratified unanimously by the Senate (23-0, 9 not voting, so even over the required two-thirds if that had to be an absolute matter) includes in it a clause explicitly stating that the US is not a Christian nation. Many of the people who wrote that document were from Virginia, which itself was actually aggressively secular, and, yes, it was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state so that no religion could use the government to oppress other religions.

The US Supreme Court has indeed held that Jefferson's writings (in particular, his letter to the Danbury Baptists, who were being persecuted in Connecticut as they were not Congregationalists) "may be accepted as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] Amendment." (Reynolds v. U.S., 1879.) However, at the time those amendments were understood only to apply to acts of Congress, not the states, and it would not be until well after the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment (since the Privileges and Immunities Clause, which should have immediately applied all those provisions to the states, was instead ignored in the Slaughter-House Cases) that such state laws, including anti-blasphemy laws, were struck down.

[10]“Neither shalt thou gather the bunches and grapes that fall down in thy vineyard, but shalt leave them to the poor and the strangers to take. I am the Lord your God.” Dhouy-Rheims Latin Vulgate Translation

“He doth judgment to the fatherless and the widow, loveth the stranger, and giveth him food and raiment. [19] And do you therefore love strangers, because you also were strangers in the land of Egypt. [20]”

Those verses do say to love strangers and give food and clothing to them, but it does not have anything to do with immigration policy. While God commanded the Isrealites to treat strangers well, they were still considered foreigners, and God did not command the Israelites to have the strangers become citizens of Israel. Plus there wasn’t strict border enforcement back then, so it wasn’t illegal for wandering strangers to wander into Israel, so the strangers did not break any laws.

As I said freedom of and from religion does not mean that the government cannot promote Christianity. It just means that the government cannot have an establishment of any particular sect over another or oppress other religions. And while the treaty of Tripoli says that the government is not founded on a religion that does not mean that the US is not a Christian nation because at the time the vast majority of Americans were Christian.