The sun is four hundred times wider than the moon. It is also four hundred times further away. More or less. They're not perfectly matched, but they're close enough to give us some awesome eclipses, it's true.
As for tidal effects, that's also due to the greater distance of the sun than the moon. Tidal effects are a result of the way gravity drops off in a cubic manner. That is, if you go twice as far away, gravity is eight times weaker. Because the far end of a body experiences weaker gravity than the near end, it causes things like tides. The far side of the Earth from the sun simply isn't all that much further away, compared to the total distance from the sun. So tidal effects are fairly weak. The distance to the moon, however, is much less, which means that the difference between its gravity on the near and far sides of the Earth are enough to cause noticeable effects.
For other evidence, the orbits of the planets simply don't make sense if you assume they revolve around the Earth. What, in your model, compels the planets to double back on themselves, as they would have to be doing for geocentrism to work?
And we could never have sent a probe to Saturn if the heliocentric model didn't work. The math would have failed entirely. And yet the probe made it just fine, took pictures just as nice as you please.
Sorry, fellow. Your model's been broken for over five hundred years. Better luck another time.