Illusive, that's pretty much what you should have done. The photos and quotes kinds cluttered up the point of your post, but your last post was a whole lot clearer.
I did agree that highlighting these individuals was the right thing to do. I'm pleased about the shame level that Techcrunch invited upon themselves for allowing sleazy apps, and I hope this trend continues. On the other hand, should I rally a boycott of Ubuntu and Arch because of these guys? I don't think you'll be finding the Titstare app in their respective repos anytime in the near future.
Thank you for leading into my second point. The same behavior is present and tolerated in the communities’ specific to any given distro. This is why I posted the Fedora Upskirt Incident caused by Nicu Buculei. It demonstrates three things:
1) Nicu Buculei is a corrupt gatekeeper, he used his position to post sexual harassment believing it to be acceptable. Given the amount of users who rushed to his defense verses those who opposed him, it was deemed acceptable.
2) Notice that I used a picture of him with his child. This is outside the scope of the stereotype that the trash of the Linux Community are just sexually and socially immature males. He is mature, he is married and thus had prolonged social and sexual contact with women. Despite all of this he still targeted women on a public bus and refused to take down the picture he uploaded thus he is still misogynistic.
3) Other gatekeepers on Fedora Planet either failed to act or were corrupt as it is still syndicated,
one even defended him publically! No one forced them to do so, they willing chose to do so. Private messages are not good enough, cover-ups do not solve the problem. Anyone who posts sexual harassment needs to be thrown the fuck out. Such should be publically stated policy as it will dispel the stereotype mentioned above and improve the community.
Now I must put a second question to you. If gatekeepers are unable and/or unwilling to counter misogyny, who can?